Joshua Graves
Exploring the Collision of Culture & Faith
Challenge of Communication
March 22, 2010

Whether one writes, teaches, preaches, creates films . . . the challenge to communicate well is a weight. I’m trying to be more aware of this in my own preaching, teaching, and writing. The following categories are not original, I’ve seen them in several different venues.

INTELLECTUAL. Some people connect to God through the mind. They want critical, well-informed, nuanced, but straightforward communication. They won’t settle for cheap/weak stereo-types (no matter how funny) but appreciate a “deep wisdom” based upon the complex questions that under-gird our world.

RELATIONAL. Many people are “heart” Christians. That is, they connect to God/spirituality through the lens of friendships, marriage, and family systems. These folks point out that God is a relational God, and we are called into community. When they hear a message or read something, they want to know/experience how this connects to their immediate relationships.

MYSTIC. A growing group, this sub-set values mystery, creativity, art, and paradox. They tend to gravitate towards meditation, chanting, readings, and silence.

JUSTICE. These are “hands” Christians. Their primary connecting point to God/Christian faith is building homes for Habitat, caring for the poor, spending life with the marginalized.

With any “typology” . . . there are holes and over-simplifications to be found. But, these make sense to me as I think about upcoming teachings/conferences/writing projects. Because I believe Jesus was fully human and fully God, I believe he shows us what it means to be human for our time and place. A human who showed the world what intellectual genius looks like on the ground (philosophers are still wrestling with his social ethic); what it means to live in deep friendship; what it means to endure the mystery of good and evil and the many paradoxes of being human; and what it means to pray for God’s way to be manifested on earth as it is in heaven (justice: repairing the world).

Two questions.

1. What “type” do you most identify with?

2. What “other” type does your wife/significant other/best friend belong to?

7 Comments

1. I think I’m probably an intellectual/mystic sort of person generally, but I like to think those intellectual conclusions lead me towards a more emphatic position on justice!

2. My wife totally rolls relational. No doubt.

How about “Enthhusiastic” as a category? I think some people react more specifically to energy than they do anything else. That might be just a dimension of the other types, but I think you could make a good argument for its inclusion in its own right.

by Steven Hovater (Mar 22 2010, 9:27 pm)

Steven,

Thanks for the note. Good observations. My wife is “relational” for sure with a leaning toward justice. I’m probably intellectual with a leaning toward justice. As I’m thinking about our ministry staff @ OC . . . we’re pretty diverse (though I realize this is only way to to measure).

I’ll give the “enthusiastic” slant a consideration. I would think that relates to relational (the human element). Thinking …

by josh (Mar 23 2010, 5:53 am)

What I meant to write is that, in my 20’s I had a leaning toward justice (still trumped by learning, intellect) but now I feel I’m becoming much more of a mystic.

by josh (Mar 23 2010, 6:45 am)

That is a difficult question for me. I learn much about God and how to love God through intellectual and justice but I am also learning to appreciate how to allow God to have all of my life through the catagories of relational and mystic, as I have been a participant in a house church for the last nine months.

I would say my wife is much more relational and mystic (although I think she would prefer the term “contemplative”).

Grace and peace,

Rex

by K. Rex Butts (Mar 23 2010, 10:06 am)

I’m definitely a mystic with a heavy leaning toward justice. I think the mystic part is from my Catholic upbringing with the chants, silence, and readings. And I’m a mystic because I’ve tried bringing my art into my worship with God the more and more I grow as an artist (in attempts to become like God Himself; a creator).

by Courtney Strahan (Mar 23 2010, 7:43 pm)

Definitely intellectual/justice leaning, but I think I appreciate the other two as well.

And I think Justice necessarily entails the relational. I can help folks in my neighborhood with physical needs, but sometimes, what they need and want more than anyone is someone who will listen, and love them where they are.

And true justice, that is transformative, only occurs through relationship.

by Justin (Mar 23 2010, 8:06 pm)

You have written a very good post. One observation– sometimes those of us who teach/preach seem to get stuck in our own leaning. We frame our messages in our own category and then primarily communicate to people who have this bent. While we all have a bent of some kind, we could be more conscious of those who are different from ourselves and perhaps make more of an effort to connect with people who come at things very different than ourselves.

by Jim Martin (Apr 4 2010, 4:31 pm)

One Trackback

  1. [...] Here is the original post: Challenge of Communication – Joshua Graves: Exploring the … [...]

Post a Comment

Join in the dialogue. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Read My BlogAbout The BookSee The FilmWritings and Other ResourcesAbout the AuthorAdditional Links