Whether one writes, teaches, preaches, creates films . . . the challenge to communicate well is a weight. I’m trying to be more aware of this in my own preaching, teaching, and writing. The following categories are not original, I’ve seen them in several different venues.
INTELLECTUAL. Some people connect to God through the mind. They want critical, well-informed, nuanced, but straightforward communication. They won’t settle for cheap/weak stereo-types (no matter how funny) but appreciate a “deep wisdom” based upon the complex questions that under-gird our world.
RELATIONAL. Many people are “heart” Christians. That is, they connect to God/spirituality through the lens of friendships, marriage, and family systems. These folks point out that God is a relational God, and we are called into community. When they hear a message or read something, they want to know/experience how this connects to their immediate relationships.
MYSTIC. A growing group, this sub-set values mystery, creativity, art, and paradox. They tend to gravitate towards meditation, chanting, readings, and silence.
JUSTICE. These are “hands” Christians. Their primary connecting point to God/Christian faith is building homes for Habitat, caring for the poor, spending life with the marginalized.
With any “typology” . . . there are holes and over-simplifications to be found. But, these make sense to me as I think about upcoming teachings/conferences/writing projects. Because I believe Jesus was fully human and fully God, I believe he shows us what it means to be human for our time and place. A human who showed the world what intellectual genius looks like on the ground (philosophers are still wrestling with his social ethic); what it means to live in deep friendship; what it means to endure the mystery of good and evil and the many paradoxes of being human; and what it means to pray for God’s way to be manifested on earth as it is in heaven (justice: repairing the world).
Two questions.
1. What “type” do you most identify with?
2. What “other” type does your wife/significant other/best friend belong to?




1. I think I’m probably an intellectual/mystic sort of person generally, but I like to think those intellectual conclusions lead me towards a more emphatic position on justice!
2. My wife totally rolls relational. No doubt.
How about “Enthhusiastic” as a category? I think some people react more specifically to energy than they do anything else. That might be just a dimension of the other types, but I think you could make a good argument for its inclusion in its own right.
by Steven Hovater (Mar 22 2010, 9:27 pm)